<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Joel Johnson Has Him a Blog</title>
      <link>http://joeljohnson.com/</link>
      <description>I am a freelance technology writer living and working in New York.
Contact me: (347) 495-0610; 249 15th St. #2, Brooklyn, NY, 11215 joeljohnsonatthatcrazygmail.com; aim: lev2300</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:51:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Make 100 World of Warcraft Gold a Week in Just Minutes a Day</title>
         <description>By following a few simple maxims for just minutes a day, you can make about 100 gold a week in the World of Warcraft Auction House (AH). This guide won&apos;t make you the richest person on your server, but will allow you to make plenty of gold to keep your character in nice equipment, mounts, and materials for tradeskills.

This guide is short for a reason: There&apos;s not much you really need to know to get started with this technique. Rather than confusing you with lots of conditionals, I will show you how to spend about 10 minutes a day generating gold, leaving you with the rest of your time to enjoy the fighting and exploration.

This guide is useful for everyone, regardless of class, race, profession, or chosen tradeskill.

1. The Prep
2. The Cycle
3. The Subtlety
4. The Wrap Up</description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:51:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Next CNet</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I've had an idea that I've wanted to implement for several years, but can't quite seem to find the ability to make it happen, because it would involve expertise and resources I don't have. I actually put together a business plan for this a few months ago when I was working for Wired, but I never heard anything about whether they thought my idea was solid or not.

In essence, I'd like to build a comprehensive database of consumer electronics information, then make that data publicly accessible via API, to create the ur-site for gadgets. (Then games; then cars; then...)

By collecting all that data about a gadget&mdash;and I'm talking every last little detail, from the number of things included in the box, the package dimensions, an items ability to be hacked, links to official drivers, release dates, firmware updates&mdash;and making it open to public calls, you could end up creating the mother-base to serve as reference for any consumer electronics owner. You could also index reviews from various sites, such as Amazon, CNET, and Epinions, as well as user-submitted scores, to create a meta score a la Metacritic. (I've reserved the URL "gearrankings.com" for just this idea, but never done anything with it.)

There are some similar projects out there, like Amazon's Product Wiki, but they don't work for the same reason that Wikipedia doesn't supplant the idea of <a href="http://freebase.com">Freebase</a>. (Freebase, incidentally, might be a good backend for this project, but I can't say since they not only have invite-only access, but have shut down all ways to contact anyone working for their company, MetaWeb.) A project like this could serve as a platform for an editorial-based organization like CNET, as well, but only if they gave fair weight to others' reviews as well as their own. I think full-time input by staffers would be good to get a project off the ground, but surely OCD community members would be willing to document the majority product details.

The use cases make it more compelling, I think: Wouldn't it be great to be able to follow the lifecycle of a product from rumor to end-of-life? Wouldn't it be nice to have one reference source for drivers, manuals, and customer service numbers? Wouldn't it be useful to be able to gather data about the number of firmware releases per product by company? Warranty length cross sorted by price? A phone under $100 that is produced by a company with a 3.5 star or greater customer service rating that uses recyclable package? All DVD players that can be hacked to be region-free but are made in North America?

It would be a monumental data collection effort, but I think that people would be willing to step up simply because it would put so much useful consumer information back into the hands of web. And being the moderator of that information might not be a bad way to make a little money.]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 09:48:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Comments Are Off</title>
         <description>The Akismet plug-in for MT doesn&apos;t work like it does on Wordpress, so I&apos;m still getting slammed with bad comments, and there doesn&apos;t seem to be a simple way to put all comments in a queue for approval. Why does Wordpress+Akismet get comments so right but MT seems to screw it all up? Typekey was a nice notion, but it should be scrapped.</description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 09:33:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hey, I Redesigned It!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[That wasn't so bad after all. I got StyleCatcher working, found the most barebones template I could find, and punched in some sidebar modules. I've also opened up commenting again, although I couldn't quite figure out how to make the Akismet plugin automatically queue spam comments. (Or at least I'm not <i>sure</i> that it's working yet.

Anyway, not too bad. Might need to tighten up the padding on the post footers just a hair, though.]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:51:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Spring Cleaning: Akismet Spam Comment Cleansing Added!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I really want to redesign this site, as I really don't have time to blog here since launching <a href="http://dethroner.com">Dethroner</a>. I'd instead like to start using this as a holding area for clips, story ideas, and projects, not unlike what Rob's done with <a href="http://www.susurrations.com./">Susurrations</a>. I'd move it over to Wordpress (although I still prefer MT's posting interface), but I have several sites here running on MT that I don't have any desire to port, so MT it is.

I am shocked how poor the choice is out there for free MT templates, however. Even just multi-columned layouts are few and far between. I may have to break out the ol' CSS (lack of) skills, which is terrifying, but good practice for upcoming <i>Dethroner</i> tweaks that will need to be made. (And for which I can nary afford to hire a real designer.)

Redesigning this site also gives me an opportunity to play with Panic's new "Coda" web application for OS X, which is on a 14-day sampleware lock, giving me a nice motivating time limit, too. ]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:33:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Three-Hearted Ale in Primary</title>
         <description>OG 1.060ish. Extract kit.</description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Beer</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:10:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>This is a Test Post</title>
         <description>I very nearly killed my whole MT install, so I&apos;m just making sure I can still post.</description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:55:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wally Wood&apos;s 22 Panels Debunked!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://joeljohnson.com/archives/images/%5B22%20Panels%5D%20Debunked.html" onclick="window.open('http://joeljohnson.com/archives/images/%5B22%20Panels%5D%20Debunked.html','popup','width=1600,height=1215,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false">View image</a> Courtesy of <a href="http://metafuture.com">Matt Gallant</a>.

See also Dan's <a href="http://danguyf.livejournal.com/168323.html">Bad Comics</a>, a remixed version of Wood's 22 Panels in a similar vein.
]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Not Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:51:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Mac OS X 10.5 Screensaver Error?</title>
         <description>Whenever I am running on battery power my screensaver comes on every minute or two, despite the fact that it is set to run after about 20 minutes. Anyone ever have a similar issue? I&apos;m stumped.</description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:47:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wally Wood&apos;s 22 Panels That Always Work: Unlimited Edition</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://joeljohnson.com/images2/wallywood22panel1600.jpg"><img alt="wallywood22thumb.jpg" src="http://joeljohnson.com/archives/images/wallywood22thumb.jpg" width="392" height="196" class="center"/></a>

I'd seen "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wally_Wood">Wally Wood</a>'s 22 Panels That Always Work" around the net here and there for several years, always as a low-resolution scan of a copy that was clearly the product of dozens of generations of photocopies. As a comics fan and occasional artist who absorbed what little drawing skill I have by copying and tracing comics when I was a teenager, I found the juxtaposition in Wood's piece telling. Here was a working artist distilling his craft into 22 panels that could be used to teleport across the occasional creative wasteland, yet each example was dashed off with effortless skill. I live by very few maxims, but there's at least one I've found useful: <i>Fake it 'til you make it.</i> In Wood's piece I could see an artist who had clearly made it but hadn't forgotten the practicality of the occasional shortcut.

A few months ago my friend Felipe Li showed me yet another copy of "22 Panels," offhandedly mentioning that the original paste-up was for sale at <a href="http://gothamcityart.com">Gotham City Art</a>, with the dubious price of "Make Offer." The listing for the piece, now removed, read as follows:
<blockquote>Ask any working comic book artist who has been in the business for more than ten years about "Wally Wood's 22 Panels That Always Work", and they know of it like it was the bible. Google "Wally Wood" and "22 panels", and you get over 150 hits. It is with great pleasure that GothamCityArt.com brings this historic piece to market. Once shrouded in secrecy, Wally Wood would selectively give assistants and those close to him three 8x10 photocopies of comic panels that bore the absolute essence of drawing comic book panels. 22 images in total, they held the secret to a comic book illustrator's success, and those who learned from them benefited from the master's wisdom. The panels were gold, but were not packaged in such a way that was easily disseminated.

Years later as an Editor at Marvel, Wood's former assistant, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Hama">Larry Hama</a>, needed a tool to give direction to his would-be artists. He had two copies of the three sheets. With the help of another ex-assistant of Wally Wood's (whom he recalls may have been Paul Kirchner), Hama reassembled the "Tri-Force" of Wally Wood sheets. On the back of a Marvel art Bristol board, Hama wrote the now-famous caption "Wally Wood's 22 Panels That Always Work", and had Robbie Carosella and Elliot Brown stat down the sheets. He ran off 50 copies from the board, and handed them out to potential pencilers. Pretty soon, other editors were sending pencilers and even some old pros down the hall to get copies from him. Eventually, he had more master copies statted and gave them to other editors so they could make their own copies to pass out. The original paste-up, with Hama's original hand-lettering, was eventually tucked into an envelope and put in the back of a flatfile, where it stayed for more than a decade. Second, third, fourth, tenth and twentieth generation copies continue to be made and handed down. The artwork pictured here is the original pasteup, as well as the three 8x10 copies that were statted down to make the board. Some of the panels, which were lost through use, were restated to the original board over the years.</blockquote>

I made what I considered to be a low bid and it was accepted. It is now my pleasure to offer these relatively high-resolution versions of "Wally Wood's 22 Panels That Always Work" in "Unlimited Edition," scanned in from the original paste-up. The widescreen versions include the whole of the paste board, including a serendipitously open area on the left hand side of the image that makes them practical to use as desktops for your computer, despite the otherwise busy background of the rest of the piece. My scanner is not large enough to scan the entire paste board at once, so I have tried to make a reasonable effort to stitch together four separate scans, although I did not go to any great length to remove all trace of seams.

There is also a 4:3 black-and-white version, tweaked to provide a 1600 by 1200 pixel duotone that emulates the previous versions available on the internet, albeit with greater fidelity.

While I did not leave any watermark or URL on the specific image files, I would ask that you refrain from using the images for any commercial purposes without my permission. Otherwise, please disseminate as freely as you like. Part of the reason I bought the piece was to ensure that it remained available to any artists who might find it inspiring or useful.

Larry Hama, who pasted together the piece and did the lettering, was kind enough to respond to an email I had sent him after purchasing the piece. Note especially his suggestion that Wood created this piece not for others, but as a reminder to himself to not become bogged down in unproductive eddies. Hama's correspondence follows:<blockquote>I worked for Wally Wood as his assistant in the early '70s, mostly on the Sally Forth and Cannon strips he did for the Overseas Weekly.  I lettered the strips, ruled borders, swipe-o-graphed reference, penciled backgrounds and did all the other regular stuff as well as alternating with Woody on scripting Cannon and Sally Forth.

The "22 Panels" never existed as a collected single piece during Woody's lifetime. Another ex-Wood assistant, Paul Kirchner had saved three Xeroxed sheets of the panels that would comprise the compilation.  I don't believe that Woody put the examples together as a teaching aid for his assistants, but rather as a reminder to himself.  He was always trying to kick himself to put less labor into the work!  He had a framed motto on the wall, "Never draw anything you can copy, never copy anything you can trace, never trace anything you can cut out and paste up."  He hung the sheets with the panels on the wall of his studio to constantly remind himself to stop what he called "noodling."

When I was starting out as an editor at Marvel, I found myself in the position of having to coach fledgling artists on the basics of visual storytelling, and it occurred to me that the reminder sheets would help in that regard, but three eight-by-ten pieces of paper were a bit unwieldy, so I had Robby Carosella, the Marvel photostat guy at the time, make me re-sized copies of all the panels so I could fit them all on one sheet.  I over-compensated for the half-inch on the height (letter paper is actually 8 1/2 by 11) so the main body of images once pasted up came a little short.  I compensated for that by hand lettering the title.</blockquote>

<b>Images:</b>
&bull; <a href="http://joeljohnson.com/images2/wallywood22panel2560.jpg">Original Scan, 2560 x 1600 pixels</a>
&bull; <a href="http://joeljohnson.com/images2/wallywood22panel1920.jpg">Original Scan, 1920 x 1200 pixels</a>
&bull; <a href="http://joeljohnson.com/images2/wallywood22panel1680.jpg">Original Scan, 1680 x 1050 pixels</a>
&bull; <a href="http://joeljohnson.com/images2/wallywood22panel1440.jpg">Original Scan, 1440 x 900 pixels</a>
&bull; <a href="http://joeljohnson.com/images2/wallywood22panel1280.jpg">Original Scan, 1280 x 800 pixels</a>

&bull; <a href="http://joeljohnson.com/images2/wallywood22panel1600.jpg">4:3 Black and White "Clean" Scan, 1600 x 1200 pixels</a>]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Not Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:50:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Xubuntu: Simple, Clean, Fast</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Inspired partially by <a href="http://www.kottke.org/06/07/apple-ubuntu-switch">Doctorow and Pilgrim's switch</a> to Linux from OSX but mostly out of a desire to resuscitate ancient laptops for use in situations where they may need be disposable, I installed Ubuntu (Dapper Drake) on a Thinkpad A21e (600MHz Celeron, 256MB RAM, 10GB HDD). It was dog slow and I couldn't find a theme that didn't seem to waste lots of my limited 1,024 by 768 screen real estate. (I'm the kind of person who changes XP's theme back to 'classic' because the task and title bars are, like, 3 pixels thinner.)

So after spending the better part of a day install and compiling new applications and drivers, I blew away my Ubuntu install and tried <a href="http://xubuntu.org">Xubuntu</a>, the "lighter, more efficient" version of Ubuntu that uses the snappy Xfce desktop instead of GNOME. Xubuntu was what I was hoping Ubuntu would be, providing a capable, useable environment in which to browse the web (with Opera), run a few applications like GAIM and Thunderbird, and still bop around in the menus without waiting for the icons to load.

If you're looking to make a man out of an old computer, try Xubuntu. It's a trivially easy install. That said, it's still Linux, which no matter how hard it tries continues to show up to the usability prom with its dress tucked into its hose. The first time apt-get failed I knew I'd be administering my desktop again instead of just using it. Are the Linux developers too oblivious to the real world to realize that there is never any reason a user should be on the command line anyway? Like, never <i>ever</i>?]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 08:59:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Second Annual Gawker Media Bug Out</title>
         <description>Today is my last day as &apos;Executive Editor, Technology&apos; at Gawker Media. Long and the short of it is that there was a disagreement about my role within the company and I have decided I would be happier elsewhere. No hard feelings. In fact I expect I&apos;l&apos; be working with Denton &amp; Co. off and on for a long time.

I&apos;ve several Exciting! New! Plans! in the works, most of which will crash and burn before they ever reach the public eye, but for now I&apos;m back in the freelance saddle. I gave notice a couple weeks ago and started sending out feelers and have already had several interesting offers, a scenario with which most writers are not blessed and one that I continue to owe to my relationship and experiences with Nick Denton and Gawker Media.

If&apos;n you&apos;d like to get a hold of me, please feel free to use any of the contacts displayed sub-elephant. A tip: &apos;thatcrazygmail.com&apos; is not an actual domain.</description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 12:40:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Fuck Apple Saft (Again)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[While I'm fucking people, I am very angry with you, Apple. I'm posting this from my PC, because my Macbook Pro won't open up Safari now without crashing ever since the 10.4.7 upgrade. It looks like I'm going to have to reinstall OSX&mdash;something I used to brag about never having to do with Apple's operating system.

Considering I was already supposed to bring this thing in for a logic board replacement, I might just try to back up my data and take it in to the Apple store and live without my laptop for the two weeks the estimate it will take for it to be fixed.

Not a happy user right now, Apple.

<i>Update:</I> The very nice, seemingly stoned Apple phone tech helped me discover it is not my entire Mac that is futzed, but instead just Safari. And <i>only Safari on my account, which is the one with Saft.]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 08:00:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Fuck Saft</title>
         <description><![CDATA[I like Apple's Safari web browser. I don't love it&mdash;who can love a browser?&mdash;but I prefer a few of the integration options it offers over using, say, Firefox.

So a year ago I finally gave in and bought <a href="http://haoli.dnsalias.com/Saft/">Saft</a>, a third-party tool that extends or adds some of the 'missing features' to Safari.

Don't make the same mistake.

First of all, the demo, should you choose to install it, will throw up a pop-up every so often after just a couple of days, with no option to deactivate it.

It has no uninstaller. I'm still not quite sure what to do with it.

Its upgrade system requires you to put in your email address and <i>paypal transaction code</i>, although does seem to show up in Paypal's one year history. So much for the free upgrade. Why I can't just use my email address is a mystery.

Lastly, it doesn't even add all that much functionality. Until Hao Li decides to offer a proper installer/uninstaller and a decent upgrade interface, skip it.]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Not Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 16:17:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ping: I Am Alive</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Not that I think there are too many people who are too terribly worried, but I am doing just dandy. (When Mom had mentioned she thought she should call when she hadn't seen any blog updates, I figured it was time to drop a quick word again.)

I'm still working at Gawker Media, running the tech sites (including Gizmodo, Kotaku, Lifehacker, and Consumerist). It's sort of perfect. I get to meddle with the work of the sites' editors just like Denton used to meddle with mine. Revenge, even transposed, is sweet.

Since the job is pleasant enough (and only half as stressful as helming Gizmodo was) I'm trying to force myself back into some sort of self-improvement routine: reading more (incl. smarty books, not just sci-fi and comics); building a more complete brewing kit and kegerator; writing music again; and most frustratingly, getting some exercise.

I've several mental bulwarks in place that will help me keep exercising this time, such as an upcoming <i>Dance Dance Revolution</i> tournament in which I will be competing, as well as Burning Man in August. (It always sucks to go out into the desert and not want to take my shirt off for the three-to-five minutes my skin allows.)

When I was last in Kansas City, I dressed down Mom for her eating habits and lack of exercise, leading to inevitable tears. I wasn't trying to be mean, but I was anyway, because that's what happens when I start lecturing people about things I'm also insecure about. Maybe once I figure out how to keep slim I can harangue her, but not before.

So: Sorry, Mom. If you're reading, I'm doing just fine, and I think you are, too.]]></description>
         <link>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</link>
         <guid>http://joeljohnson.com/archives/</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Me</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 07:45:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
